Commerce voters will decide on Tuesday, Nov. 6, whether they want to allow the Sunday sales of beer and wine by the package and beer, wine and distilled spirits by the drink.
The Commerce City Council voted 3-1 Monday night to hold the two separate referenda in conjunction with the general election.
Voters will face two separate questions that will be on paper ballots (they will use voting machines for the general election). One will ask about the Sunday sale of beer and wine by the package and the other about the Sunday sale of beer, wine and spirits in restaurants that currently pour the other six days a week.
Ward 2 councilman Darren Owensby cast the only dissenting vote on a motion made by Ward 5 councilman Johnny Eubanks “to give the citizens the right” to vote on the matter.
Saying the Sunday sales issue “came out of the blue,” Owensby questioned whether there is really a demand for a vote. Mayor Clark Hill and mayor pro tem Keith Burchett responded that they’ve been asked a number of times about whether there would be a Sunday sales vote.
Commerce is the only municipality in the county that allows the sale of alcohol, but has not had a referendum on Sunday sales since the law was changed to allow the option of Sunday sales.
“It seems like we’re just trying to follow what Jefferson does, what Homer does or what Banks County does,” Owensby complained. “It just seems like it’s being pushed.”
Owensby said he’s had no calls on the matter.
“In my opinion,” he said, “beer and liquor six days a week is enough. We need to leave Sunday alone, because it’s the Lord’s day and we need to treat it like the Lord’s day.”
Hill, Eubanks and Burchett all stressed that the issue is letting the people vote.
“I’d be hard pressed to vote against (holding) any referendum personally,” Hill said. “That’s what makes us Americans. …We should feel obligated to do what the majority of the people ask us to do.”
“All we’re doing is letting them decide what they want,” Burchett agreed.
“It’s not going away,” Eubanks said of the issue. “It’s coming back. The ones who asked about it are going to ask again, so I think we ought to go forward with it.”
Eubanks, Burchett and Archie Chaney voted for the motion. Councilmen Mark Fitzpatrick and Steve Perry were not present.
Voters in Jackson County recently approved Sunday sales both by the drink and by the package for unincorporated areas of the county. Banks County will hold a Sunday pouring referendum on Nov. 6. Jefferson, Braselton and Hoschton have already approved Sunday sales.
not be a tag along councilman.
We have had too many Sheeple in the Commerce
group for years. Look at the councilmen that
"were not present" to cast a ballot. Where you
the gentleman that day when it was time to stand up and be counted?
Well Mr. Owensby for one I live in your ward and you my friend have lost votes. Have you ever heard of the separation of church and state? If you dont want it dont vote for it but lets leave the church out of it and let the rest of the city vote on what they want.
I ask in return, "Have you ever heard of freedom of speech?" Hypocritical of you to ask Mr. Owensby to not speak about the Lord when we have freedom of speech in this country. It is Mr. Owensby’s right to speak on what ever he wishes. If he wants to bring up the Lord then he has ever right to do so.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
I don’t see any where above that says you can’t mention the Lord…..
Maybe the High School will let you sit in on a Government class. You've got a lot to learn…
I have alot to learn? I have no problem with Mr. Owensby's freedom of speech. He can say whatever he wants and I could care less. But in return I also have the right to freedom of speech. If this passes are you or Mr. Owensby going to stop going to church because of it? No! So in my opinion this has nothing to do with the church. It has to do with what the people of this city want and dont want thats the reason you can vote for it or against it. And I also have the right to base my vote on what my councilmen says. Isnt that how it works? So the way I see it he has his opinion, I have my opinion and you have your opinion.
Stop it. Mr. Owensby is an elected official. He should NEVER interject his PERSONAL FEELINGS into that job! Yes he does have the right to free speech, but there ARE limits to free speech. You may not have paid that close attention during your civics classes in school, but the right to free speech is not an across the board right. If he (and I am sure he does) has an opinion, then he certainly should NOT make them known during a city council meeting, open to the public to hear. It is basic parliamentary procedure. Of course, he could have just worded his statement differently i.e. "I was told that we should leave it alone" or something to that effect.
I think he has been a very fair voice in this city.
Bob Dylan- Gates Of Eden